30
Apr

alpha_logo_apr09.pngLast weekend, we attended a web demo of Wolfram Alpha, a new “computational knowledge engine” based on the work of Stephen Wolfram. Some have dubbed Alpha a “Google killer,” but, in reality, is very different from the standard search engines that we are all familiar with today.

When we got the demo, Wolfram asked us to refrain from publishing any screenshots. Today, however, the Berkman Center posted a video of the public demo Wolfram gave earlier this week, so we think it’s only fair that we share our own screenshots with our readers at this point.

Sponsor

Homepage

alpha_homepage_shot.png

Query #1: internet users in Europe

wolfram_alpha_3.png

Query #2: weather oakland

wolfram_alpha_2.png

Query #3: oakland

oakland_alpha.png

Query #4: uncle’s uncle’s brother’s son

wolfram_alpha_1.png

Query #5: water 550C 3 atm

alpha_water.png

Query #6: integrate x^3 sin^2 x dx

alpha_integrate.png

Query #7: bob

alpha_bob.png

Example of a copy and paste dialog:

alpha_copy_paste.png

Embedding Search Results:

alpha_embed.png

Here is the video of the public demo at the Berkman Center. It is a bit blurry, but it does show Wolfram Alpha in action:

Discuss


Comments Off
30
Apr

picture-253By far the two companies I’ve written about the most recently are Apple and Twitter. This is to the delight of some people, and the absolute horror of others. And now I’ve got something that will really whip up the fanboys and enrage the haters: Me writing about Apple writing about Twitter.

Yes, Apple has a new business profile of the micro-messaging service that it put up today on its site. The headline may just say it all, “Twitter. Triumph of humanity.” But it’s actually a fairly in-depth look at how Twitter uses Apple products to conduct their business. “Pretty much everyone here at Twitter uses a Mac,” says Alex Payne, Twitter’s API lead, in the video that accompanies the profile.

Specifically, the profile is pretty much like a series of talking points about why the Mac is great for business (as you might expect in such a profile). The profile delves into OS X and how it offers just about everything Twitter needs from TextMate to Keynote. And if Twitter team members really need to boot Windows for testing purposes, they just use VMware. Also brought up is the idea that Macs are more secure than PCs. And that MacBook Airs and iPhones has given employees a new state of mind about working on the go.

“Historically, people thought about the Mac as something for entertainment or graphics, but now they see the value of the Mac as a serious business tool. The same is true of Twitter,” the profile says at one point.

But there are a few interesting tidbits. One is that the profile claims Twitter gets “heavy use” out of Numbers and Pages — two pieces of software in the iWork suite that are much less popular than their Microsoft Office counterparts, Excel and Word. Another talks about the synergy between Twitter and Apple — how the keynote address at MacWorld was a big moment in early Twitter usage history. And how Twitter is now driving a lot of development for both the Mac and iPhone with third-party clients.

picture-261

The profile also claims that many of the team’s software engineers “were attracted to Twitter as an employer because of its bent for the Mac.” And that one of the reasons the office space is littered with Macs is because they are more environmentally friendly than their PC counterparts — a message Apple has been pushing heavily recently.

A quote from Twitter co-founder Biz Stone wraps up the profile, “Twitter is a minimalist communication tool that is very powerful. The Mac is the same way. It offers beautiful design, simple elegance, and a system that’s incredibly flexible and powerful to use.”

I can hear it now. The fanboys will let out a collective, “Awwww” — while the haters scream, “Get a room.”

[via Daring Fireball]

[photos via Apple]

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.


Comments Off
30
Apr

cyborgpic.jpgOne part people, one part machine. Is that a formula for more effective decision making? A number of high-profile entrepreneurs believe it is and they are starting companies based on the idea.

In the following post we take a look at three of the most exciting startups entering this emerging market. The movement is a logical development now that millions of people are comfortable posting information online. The web’s next step is to leverage machine learning. These are three companies to watch who are doing just that – combining user input with technology that improves its performance by gathering and processing data. In this case they are doing it in order to help people make better decisions, but these are just some of the first consumer technologies that will enter the cyborg-like space that combines people and machines in order to better serve people.

Sponsor

The three services we look at are Aardvark, Hunch and Swingly. Unfortunately none of these services are wide open to the public yet. If you go to their sites and request an invite you should get one soon. You might also try asking around on other networks like Twitter or Facebook, two of the three services discussed below have invites in the wild now.

Aardvark

vark.com (Our initial review)

Premise: Ask any question by IM and your question will be routed to a tagged “expert” on the topic, among your friends and their networks.

Logic: There appears to be some semantic analysis of the tags given users by their friends and themselves, cross referenced with semantic analysis of the questions asked in order to find the right fit. We presume there is or will be some logic judging the history of successful answers from users so as to rank relative expertise.

History of one query.
Aardvark2.jpg
An IM thread.
aardvark3.jpg
Editing user profile.
Aardvark1.jpg

User experience: High coolness factor when a real person quickly answers your question. How reliable that person is regarding the topic of the question is not readily apparent. Interesting IM interface facilitates relatively sophisticated interactions based on short commands. Fun to browse through open questions, smart deference to email when people aren’t available by IM. Can be irritating to be interrupted by other peoples’ questions by IM, but not such a big deal. Web interface is quite nice but I’ve hardly ever seen it, just asking and answering questions through IM.

How It Differs From the Others: IM interface offers almost zero barrier to entry and a powerful hook to return to the service over time. Machine learning focuses on identifying human experts and search is rich with human interaction, thinly mediated by a smart system. You could call this a friend-network based semantically powered expert discovery and conversation system.

Stage: Closed beta, new users get 50 invites. Has been in the works for years and is relatively well baked.

Backing: Made up largely of ex-Googlers, the parent company is called The Mechanical Zoo and has raised $6 million from very-hip VC firm August Capital and Ron Conway’s Baseline Ventures.

For more info see this review on VentureBeat.

Comments Off
30
Apr

Earlier this month we reported on eBay’s spinoff of StumbleUpon, a company it owned for a little less than two years. Ebay bought the company for $75 million in May 2007. Unknown until now, though, was the spinoff value of StumbleUpon. According to a source close to the transaction, it was $29 million.

New investors Sherpalo Ventures, Accel Partners, and August Capital joined StumbleUpon founders Garrett Camp and Geoff Smith in purchasing the company back from eBay. Outside investors put in 85% or so of the $29 million, we’ve been told, with Camp and Smith making up the rest.

eBay was paid $25 million in cash for StumbleUpon and retains a 10% interest in the spun off entity. $4 million remains in the company to fund operations.

StumbleUpon’s revenues are estimated at $5 million – $10 million annually.

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0


Comments Off
30
Apr

We’ve reported in the past on how Apple has not only been late on payments to iPhone app developers, but has also neglected to pay some developers for their app sales at the store entirely. We thought that perhaps our post might call Apple’s attention to the problem. Apparently, developers complaints have gone unheard at Apple and now they are so upset that some of them are threatening to sue Apple for breach of contract.

As we wrote earlier, Apple’s delay in payments is affecting some developers but not all of them. Some are being paid but other developers are claiming no payment from Apple for sales and continued poor customer support from Apple. You can read the complaints on the developer forums here and here.

Apple’s contract, which is embedded below, says that payment will be made to developers within 45 days of the end of the month. Developers are claiming that there are massive delays in payments for as early as last fall and are not being paid the amount of money that the developers are in fact due from sales. One developer, who hasn’t been paid since November 2008, forwarded us an email chain between Apple’s App Store finance team and himself. An Apple employee, who was responding to the developers complaints, wrote that the developer’s continued emails about the late payments was “bordering on harassment,” and claimed that the finance team receives thousands of emails a day and couldn’t get to his right away. Another developer on the forum says that he hasn’t been paid since September and is owed close to $7000 for sales.

It’s not clear how serious these threats are. After all, it is a forum and it’s a lot easier to vent and make empty legal threats in an anonymous forum. But it appears that despite the media reports, developer complaints, emails, and calls surrounding the delays in payments, Apple has not corrected its system at all. It’s definitely cause to wonder what is going on with Apple. Didn’t Apple just post its best second quarter earnings in the history of the company? We also recently wrote about Apple’s seemingly unfair refund policy, which puts developers at a clear disadvantage. And Apple owes a lot to iPhone app developers-the App store just reached 1 billion app downloads thanks to those very same savvy developers who have created useful and creative apps.

As we wrote in the past, Apple is in danger of alienating developers and giving them reasons why they shouldn’t be developing for the iPhone (on the forums, a few developers said they may even give up on the App store)—namely, they’re at the mercy of Apple, which is making a habit of taking its developers for granted.

iPhone app contract – Get more Information Technology

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.


Comments Off